New CPAWS report underlines weaknesses in Newfoundland and Labrador marine protected areas

  • Published on Jun 01 2015 |
  • This article is tagged as: marine, News, MPAs

St. John’s -- In its annual report released today on Canada’s progress in protecting its ocean, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) has found that the regulations and policies governing existing marine protected areas (MPAs) are too often weak or confusing.

“It is worrying that human activities known to harm ocean ecosystems are permitted in any of Canada’s marine protected areas. Yet they are, including in Newfoundland and Labrador, and these activities include oil and gas exploration, large-scale commercial fishing, and dredging and dumping,” says CPAWS-NL’s Co-Executive Director Tanya Edwards.

“For example, in the proposed Laurentian Channel MPA, oil and gas exploration and drilling would be permitted, potentially putting at risk the health of endangered sharks, whales, sea turtles and deep-sea corals and the entire marine ecosystem that the MPA is supposed to be protecting,” adds Edwards.

To prepare its nation-wide assessment, CPAWS reviewed publicly available data, regulations and management plans published by federal agencies about their marine protected areas. Where information was not publicly available, it submitted requests to the relevant government agencies.

“In the case of provincial sites, protection from the activities we focused on requires federal agencies to exercise their legal mandates, which generally does not appear to be the case,” says CPAWS National Oceans Program Director Sabine Jessen.

“We were very surprised that the rules for Canada’s MPAs at both the federal and provincial levels are not clearer about prohibited activities from the outset. Only the National Marine Conservation Areas Act has clear prohibitions on oil and gas activities, and provisions related to dredging and dumping,” adds Jessen.

“In fact, the only human activity significantly restricted by the proposed Laurentian Channel MPA management regulations will be fishing, but almost no fishing was taking place within the boundaries of the proposed MPA anyway,” says CPAWS-NL’s Co-Executive Director Suzanne Dooley.

Other report highlights:
•  A comparison of G20 Countries by the U.S. Marine Conservation Institute, found only .11% of Canada's ocean estate fully closed to all extractive uses (including oil and gas and fishing activities), leaving Canada far behind many other G20 countries. For example, the U.S. and U.K. have nearly 10% of their MPAs fully closed to extractive activities, South Africa's and Australia's are at 4% and Russia's are at .59%.

• Although underwater oil and gas exploration and development pose a major threat to marine life, CPAWS found that in one-third (8) of Canada`s 23 federally designated marine protected sites there is no permanent prohibition of these activities. 

• Overfishing and harmful fishing activities pose a serious threat to marine life. Properly designed marine protected areas provide essential "nurseries" for fish to breed and grow into healthy adults.  However, CPAWS found that less than 600 km2 within federally designated MPAs, representing .01% of Canada's ocean estate, are designated as "no fishing" zones.

• Dredging and dumping can cause significant harm to marine life by altering sensitive habitats where aquatic species breed and grow. However, CPAWS found five of the 23 federal MPAs permit these activities, for example to maintain wharves and boat launches and keep navigable waterways open.

• CPAWS researchers found that MPA regulations and plans were often unclear about what activities were permitted or not within their borders.  In many cases, a list of restricted activities within a specific MPA is followed by an equally long list of exclusions and exemptions, calling into question the true value of the regulations.

“With just 1.3% of Canada’s vast ocean estate officially “protected”, our concern about marine conservation is higher than ever.  As we reported last year, Canada needs to significantly increase in the amount of our ocean designated as protected to catch up to countries like the U.S., where 30% of its ocean estate is legally protected. Now we’re also recommending much stronger and consistent management rules for all of our MPAs.

“Science shows that strong networks of MPAs help to sustain and regenerate fisheries. Properly regulated MPAs can also provide stability and resiliency in the ocean in response to climate change.  However, we fear that little marine conservation will be accomplished by Canada’s weak MPA regulations that are too often in place now,” says Jessen.

“We’re recommending that Newfoundland and Labrador take a much more proactive approach, working with the federal government, to put strong and clear regulations in place for marine protected areas so that these places can live up to their name,” says Dooley.


View full report at:

For media interviews, contact: Suzanne Dooley,, Cell # 682-9194  Office # 726-5800 or Tanya Edwards, Cell # 727-7789